High Tunnel Evaluation of Vertically-Grown Cantaloupe and Galia Melon Varieties

In issue 619 and 620 of the Vegetable Crops Hotline newsletter I gave you a brief background of the materials used and methods followed during the variety evaluation. I also discussed some of the challenges we encountered while doing the trial work. The varieties evaluated included:

Entry # Variety
1 Sephia (Galia type)
2 Tirreno (Italian netted cantaloupe)
3 Rawan (Ananas type)
4 Rowena (Ananas type)
5 Migdal (Galia type)
6 Magnificenza (Italian netted cantaloupe)
7 Kenza (Charentais)
8 Karameza (fully netted cantaloupe)
Petrus Image 1

Figure 1. Cantaloupe and Galia melon fruit

Preliminary data will be discussed in this article. Statistical analysis of all the data has not been concluded and therefore only treatment averages are reported.

Yield: One of the criteria that was set for the variety trial was that the fruit size needed to be between 2 – 4 lbs. At Meig’s Farm Magnificenza, Sephia and Kenza produced fruit that varied in weight between 3.28 and 3.96 lbs. Migdal and Magnificenza produced fruit less than 4 lbs at HGRH.

The yield per plant was lower than expected. Several factors, i.e. environmental stress and pests, have contributed to the lower yield. Average yields in Southern Indiana is approximately 6,000 fruit per acer at a planting density of 2,904 plants per acre. Productivity, depending on the variety used, in the high tunnel at Meig’s Farm was 50% to 343% higher than field grown melons. At the HLA Plant Growth Facility (HGRH) a 16% decrease in yield was observed with Rawan. The other varieties showed yield increases of between 6% and 225% compared to field grown melon. The worst performing varieties were Rawan and Rowena. The very large fruit size made these varieties not suitable for vertical high tunnel production. At Meig’s Farm Magnificenza, Karameza and Kenza produced the highest yields followed by Sephia, Migdal and Tirreno. Magnificenza produced at Meig’s Farm was the only variety to reach and average fruit yield of 2 fruit per plant. Fruit yields of more than 4 per plant will be ideal for this production system. The much higher total number of fruit produced per acre in these trials are mainly driven by the much higher plant densities that were used (Meig’s Farm 11,805 and HGRH 13,280 plants per acre).

Very few fruit were unmarketable. Unmarketable fruit included fruit that were too small or fruit with visible cracks in the exocarp. Kenza and Karameza were the only varieties that produced fruit with cracks. A few Kenza fruit actually burst open at the blossom-end. Charentais are known to crack when it receives too much water during the last 10-14 days of ripening.

Petrus Image 2

Figure 2. Kenza cracked open at the blossom-end

Table 1: Yield

Variety Fruit Size (lb) # Fruit/plant # Fruit/Acre
Trial location HGRH Meig’s HGRH Meig’s HGRH Meig’s
Sephia 4.67 3.84 1.2 1.5 14,166 19,920
Migdal 3.94 4.72 0.9 1.5 10,034 19,920
Magnificenza 3.65 3.28 1.7 2.00 19,478 26,560
Tirreno 4.86 5.15 0.8 1.50 9,444 19,920
Kenza 4.55 3.96 1.5 1.75 17,708 23,240
Karameza 4.57 5.41 0.9 1.83 10,625 24,347
Rawan 11.50 7.94 0.4 0.75 5,066 9,960
Rowena 11.53 7.40 0.5 0.92 6,345 12,173

Quality: Variation in cantaloupe fruit juice pH values exists as a result of varietal differences and growing conditions. The approximate cantaloupe fruit juice pH is usually between 6.13 and 6.58. Sephia had lower pH levels at both trial locations. All varieties produced at HGRH, except Karameza, had a below normal pH level. According to the USDA Standards for Grades of Cantaloupe “very good internal quality” and “good internal quality” means that juices from the edible portion of a cantaloupe sample contains no less than 11 and 9 percent soluble solids, respectively, as determined by a hand refractometer. Only Migdal (at Meig’s Farm and Magnificenza (HGRH) produced fruit that almost reached the USDA “good internal quality” grade. All other varieties had suboptimal soluble solids levels. Fruit produced at Meig’s Farm were firmer than those produced at HGRH, except for the variety Rowena. In general fruit quality was suboptimal.

In the next round of trials other varieties will be included and a lot of focus will be placed on increasing the number of fruit per plant, fruit size, finding the optimal plant density, pest control strategies and increasing the soluble solids content of fruit.

Table 2: Internal fruit quality at harvest

Variety pH Brix (% SS) Firmness (kg)
Trial location HGRH Meig’s HGRH Meig’s HGRH Meig’s
Sephia 5.60 5.80 5.68 5.96 4.52 5.62
Migdal 5.93 6.58 7.28 8.82 6.80 7.80
Magnificenza 6.09 6.47 8.96 7.96 4.42 6.85
Tirreno 5.71 6.22 6.43 7.07 5.63 7.40
Kenza 6.01 6.15 6.58 5.81 4.42 5.47
Karameza 6.14 6.16 8.25 6.16 7.71 10.28
Rawan 6.02 7.75 4.79
Rowena 5.92 6.12 7.28 5.65 6.80 2.50


Share This Article
It is the policy of the Purdue University that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue is an Affirmative Action Institution. This material may be available in alternative formats. 1-888-EXT-INFO Disclaimer: Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others which may have similar uses. Any person using products listed in this publication assumes full responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer.
Vegetable Crops Hotline - Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture 625 Agriculture Mall Dr. West Lafayette, IN 47907

© 2017 Purdue University | An equal access/equal opportunity university | Copyright Complaints | Maintained by Vegetable Crops Hotline

If you have trouble accessing this page because of a disability, please contact Vegetable Crops Hotline at guan40@purdue.edu.